A common
question visitors ask in the reconstructed carpenter shop at Fort Vancouver NHS is
whether Hudson's Bay Company carpenters used nails in construction and other purposes, and if so where did
they come from. Carpenter shop volunteers, in turn, commonly describe the
post-on-sill construction of Fort Vancouver buildings as requiring no
nails or other metal fasteners, except for those in the floorboards and to
attach roofing material. So were nails used? Archaeological evidence says yes,
as 15,227 nails of various sizes and configurations (as well as header tools used by blacksmiths in making nails) had turned up in excavations conducted on the site from the late 1940s up through the mid-1970s. As to where
they came from, the two logical sources would seem to be hammered out in the post blacksmith
shop, or made in Europe and brought on the annual supply ship.(1) To approach these questions some context beyond the Pacific Northwest frontier is useful.
By the 1830s what has been called the First Industrial Revolution was
well underway in Europe. Following the adaptation of the steam engine for industrial use in the late 1700s Britain took the lead
in applying steam power to mechanized production in factories that produced
many basic and standardized items much more abundantly and cheaply than was previously possible.
With the invention of nail making machines in the late 1700s, nails joined textiles among the many
items that began to be mass produced.(2)
These developments meant that many things that previously had been made in small quantities by labor-intensive manual methods could be purchased in bulk from manufacturers at lower cost. Fort Vancouver in the Hudson’s BayCompany era was on an isolated frontier, the far edge of the Europe-centered commercial networks. But the Company's business was commerce, and as long as the maritime connection was maintained it could acquire just about whatever Europe could provide.
These developments meant that many things that previously had been made in small quantities by labor-intensive manual methods could be purchased in bulk from manufacturers at lower cost. Fort Vancouver in the Hudson’s BayCompany era was on an isolated frontier, the far edge of the Europe-centered commercial networks. But the Company's business was commerce, and as long as the maritime connection was maintained it could acquire just about whatever Europe could provide.
The detailed invoice for European products that arrived at
Fort Vancouver on the Barque 'Brothers' in 1844 for Outfit 1845 (which I have
used previously in discussing blankets and capots and beaver traps) lists no fewer than 430
thousand nails of various types and sizes coming from London in a single
shipment. Two hundred thousand were for attaching roof shingles, leaving nearly
a quarter of a million nails in sizes from one inch to seven inches. See the full list below.
Fort Vancouver blacksmiths might have needed to make nails and spikes on occasion or for special purposes, and more nails may have been made on site in the early years at the Vancouver location. But in view of the supplies coming in from English factories by the mid-1840s it would have been wasteful of the time and talents of skilled smiths to put them to work hammering out small nails in large quantities.
This is the full list of nails delivered to Fort Vancouver in the barque 'Brothers' in 1844. I retain the Roman numeral "M" as it appears in HBC shipping lists and inventories, to indicate one thousand. The "d" indicates the "penny" size of the nails following English nail size conventions still in use in the USA:
1 M round boat
nails 2 3/4 inch
2 M 2d brad nails
5 M 3d brad nails
6 M 4d brad nails
6 M 6d brad nails
20 M brass chair
nails
8 M 10d clasp nails
10 M 24d clinch
nails
10 M 36d clinch
nails
7 M die head deck
nails 5 inches
5 M die head deck nails 6 inches
3 M die head deck nails 7 inches
7 M die head deck
nails 7 13/20 inches fine draw
1 M counter plough nails 2 3/4 inches
1 M counter plough nails 2 inches
8 M cooper's 3d
rose nails
50 M 14d fine drawn
rose nails
50 M 20d find drawn
rose nails
10 M 24d fine drawn
rose nails
10 M 30d fine drawn
rose nails
200 M 4d fine drawn shingling nails
5 M 2d clout head
tack nails
5 M 4 ounce machine
tack nails
(1) Another possible source of nails recovered archaeologically was USA manufacture, resulting from US Army occupation of the original HBC fort after HBC left the site. The nails recovered included 7,794 of wrought rod (51%), but the method and location of manufacture, whether manual or industrial, or in Europe or at Fort Vancouver, are undetermined. There were also 7,493 cut nails (49%), which could not have been made at Fort Vancouver. These findings are discussed in detail in Lester A. Ross, “Fort Vancouver, 1829-1860: A Historical Archaeological Investigation of the Goods Imported and Manufactured by the Hudson’s Bay Company,” (Typescript, Fort Vancouver NHS, 1976), pp. 902-922.
I thank Heidi Pierson, Museum Specialist on the staff of Fort Vancouver NHS, for pointing out that archaeological evidence suggests more hand-wrought nails were used in the HBC era than might be suggested by looking at one shipment arriving from England in 1844. Heidi has prepared a very useful "mini-guide" to old nails, available HERE.
In the course of working up this posting I came across an extensive bibliography of literature on the history of nails and their interpretation in archaeology and historical restoration, available HERE.
(2) While child labor was common in the 19th century, the advent of nail-making machinery should get us past the image of workshops full of 10 year-old boys manually pounding out nails with hammer and anvil, from heated iron rod stock.
I thank Heidi Pierson, Museum Specialist on the staff of Fort Vancouver NHS, for pointing out that archaeological evidence suggests more hand-wrought nails were used in the HBC era than might be suggested by looking at one shipment arriving from England in 1844. Heidi has prepared a very useful "mini-guide" to old nails, available HERE.
In the course of working up this posting I came across an extensive bibliography of literature on the history of nails and their interpretation in archaeology and historical restoration, available HERE.
(2) While child labor was common in the 19th century, the advent of nail-making machinery should get us past the image of workshops full of 10 year-old boys manually pounding out nails with hammer and anvil, from heated iron rod stock.
It is well known
that Thomas Jefferson, who as US President purchased Louisiana Territory in
1803 and famously sent Lewis & Clark to explore it, also had a nail making
operation at his Monticello plantation, which employed slaves to make nails by hand from nail rod. In 1796 Jefferson acquired a nail making machine that used
hoop iron to make 4d brads.
The 1844 shipment discussed here included many sizes and shapes of
iron and steel bar and rod stock, but nothing called "nail rod." The smallest is “bolt rod” of
1/4” diameter.
(3) The full listing of the 1844 shipment is in Lester A. Ross, “Fort
Vancouver, 1829-1860: A Historical Archaeological Investigation of the Goods
Imported and Manufactured by the Hudson’s Bay Company,” (Typescript, Fort
Vancouver NHS, 1976), Appendix II, pp. 1,384-1,410. Nails are listed on pp. 1,400-1.